Is Vaping Health Risky?
The author examines the possible social and health advantages of adolescent smoking, while also considering potential harm. She refers to e-cigarettes as electric cigarettes but calls them a tobacco product. The authors explore the different options available for teens in light to the fact that smoking has turned into a socially unacceptable behavior. She argues that people should think about the social norms that promote smoking to teens, while also considering the dangers of nicotine addiction. The writer also examines the difference between teenage smoking and adult smoking. After reviewing the literature, I agree with her that e-cigarette vaporizers are a harmless alternative to smoking, if used correctly.
A lot of the data on smoking and its risks comes from adults, which makes it hard to assess the way the risks are reduced by e-smoking. It is estimated that approximately fourteen thousand deaths each year are because of smoking. This figure is probable an underestimation, because so many deaths may be the consequence of second hand smoke. In addition, it assumes that folks who smoke don’t plan to do so.
The writer suggests that we should think about the fact that e-cigarettes mimic the result of tobacco products, while providing a far less harmful experience. The problem with this particular approach is that it treats all smoking as dangerous, though it isn’t. Many people don’t understand how similar the taste of a cigarette to a vaporizer, or how similar the physical act of smoking would be to smoking. Furthermore, it presumes that people who use the cigarettes aren’t taking any real risks. The argument that originates from that is that because e smokers don’t feel any of the physical effects of smoking, they can not be deemed to be causing these deaths, when they are.
However, it is important to remember that smoking and using vaporizers are both very similar behaviors. Why is vaporizing unique is that it allows a smoker to achieve the same effect as smoking, minus the associated risks. Vaporizing offers a highly similar experience as smoking. This means that vapers may be increasing their likelihood of quitting the habit. It also means that they are taking steps in direction of protecting their health while simultaneously increasing the opportunity of enjoying a wholesome lifestyle.
The author makes some valid points concerning the dangers of smoking cigarettes. He also makes some valid criticisms of having less nicotine, and of the dangers of second hand smoke. However, his real issue is among regulation. He argues that e-cigarette companies shouldn’t be allowed to advertise their products as safe when all they have done is increase the amount of chemicals and additives that are present in traditional Juul Pods cigarettes. The issue with this argument is that we have already seen the negative effects of increased degrees of these chemicals in traditional cigarettes.
We curently have countless reports about the negative side effects of nicotine, especially in smokers trying to quit. We already have a lot of stories concerning the rise of cancers and respiratory problems caused by long-term nicotine use. It’s true that e-cigs don’t contain any nicotine, but that hasn’t stopped them from being advertised as a cure-all for smoking. E Cigarettes have certainly been a significant factor in the spike in smoking-related deaths in the last couple of years.
The writer does not may actually recognize the irony of arguing against smoking by way of a healthier alternative, but doesn’t appear to consider the potential negative health ramifications of his product either. He also discounts the theory that smokers who switch to the cigarettes will eventually turn back to cigarette smoking. He seems to think that all we must do to beat cigarettes would be to reduce the amount of nicotine we take in. The truth is that smokers who make an effort to quit often do so due to other medical issues, and aren’t just embracing the cigarettes to get away from their bad habits. There are plenty of reasons why people smoke. The writer has basically ignored every one of them in his arguments against vaping.
While it is true that the cigarettes usually do not contain any real tobacco, a few of the chemicals found in using tobacco are found in the smokes. The writer seems to be of the belief that all we need to do to solve the problem of smoking is to reduce the amount of chemicals we ingest through our lungs. The argument he presents is simply not based in sound scientific fact. There is no real proof that reducing how much chemicals we ingest improves anything other than our health. The author also discounts the theory that the cigarettes are less dangerous than regular cigarettes since they don’t contain the harmful chemicals found in regular cigarettes.